|
|
| Home >
News > Acupuncture
Helps Neck Pain; Massage Benefits Unclear |
Acupuncture Helps Neck Pain; Massage Benefits
Unclear
|
|
By Laura Kennedy, Contributing Writer
Health Behavior News Service
Acupuncture offers relief from chronic neck pain, while there is
little reliable evidence on the effectiveness of massage, according to two new
systematic reviews.
Acupuncture does not “cure” neck pain, and relief appears to last only a few
weeks or months. Patients may thus need periodic booster treatments, says lead
study author Kien Trinh, M.D., of McMaster University in Canada.
The massage review concludes, “Due to the limitations of existing studies, we
are unable to make any firm statement to guide clinical practice.” Bodhi
Haraldsson, a registered massage therapist in British Columbia, Canada, led the
study team.
The two studies are part of a series designed to summarize the most current
scientific evidence on treatments for neck pain due to “mechanical” problems
such as whiplash and muscle strains. Such injuries are common, disabling and
costly.
Ten percent of males and 17 percent of females report neck pain that lasts
longer than six months, according to a study cited in the massage review. Both
new reviews excluded patients with neck pain caused by major illnesses or
injuries such as viral infections or fractures.
The reviews appear in the most recent issue of The Cochrane Library, a
publication of The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization that
evaluates medical research. Systematic reviews draw evidence-based conclusions
about medical practice after considering both the content and quality of
existing medical trials on a topic.
The acupuncture study comprised 10 trials with a total of 661 adult
participants. The studies compared a number of acupuncture approaches to no
treatment, sham treatments or other “manual therapies” such as mobilization,
massage or traction. Most of the studies included at least five treatment
sessions.
“The specific effects of acupuncture are short-term, but have important clinical
treatment benefits,” conclude the review authors.
These findings are based on a wide range of patients, treatment techniques and
outcomes, said Dr. Partap Khalsa at the National Center for Complementary and
Alternative Medicine. The next step is to conduct more well-defined studies to
“optimize” the findings, said Khalsa, who was not involved with either review.
For some subgroups of patients with mechanical neck disorders, he said,
acupuncture may be the best treatment while different options may provide
greater relief for others. “We just don’t know that right now.”
Trinh calls for larger and longer trials — preferably at least 500 patients and
follow-up after a year or more — to further expand understanding of acupuncture
treatment.
The review of massage techniques comprised 19 trials involving nearly 1,400
adults. The trials compared massage alone or in combination with other
treatments to no treatment, sham treatments, mobilization, traction,
acupuncture, exercise, education and pain medication.
The authors report that the overall quality of these trials was poor. “In some
cases, it was questionable whether the massage in the study would be considered
effective massage under any circumstance.” No firm conclusions can be drawn at
this time, they conclude.
“One of the most important functions of the Cochrane Library is to demonstrate
what we do not know,” according to Bandolier, an independent British journal
focusing on evidence-based healthcare. “Good quality reviews that find no
trials, no good trials or good trials with no effect are really important in
delimiting the extent of our knowledge (or ignorance).”
The authors of the massage review call for pilot studies to define an optimal
massage intervention — including techniques along with number, duration and
frequency of treatment sessions — which can then be evaluated in subsequent
larger trials. In short, said Khalsa, researchers must “go back to ground zero,”
in studying massage treatments for chronic neck pain.
Khalsa said that many Americans — from the lay public to physicians and
scientists — have preconceived beliefs about alternative treatments. Many are
inclined to believe that acupuncture is ineffective while massage is helpful,
and they may dismiss the recent findings.
The new information will be most useful for people “who are neutral, who are
saying show me what the evidence actually is, and I will use that to inform my
own decisions,” he said.
For more of the story, click
here
|
|
|
|